Eating disorder risk and common mental disorders in British servicewomen: A cross-sectional observational study

Abstract: PurposeServicewomen are at increased risk of common mental disorders compared with servicemen and their female civilian counterparts. The prevalence of eating disorder risk and common mental disorders, and associated risk factors in British servicewomen are poorly understood.MethodsAll women younger than 45 yr in the UK Armed Forces were invited to complete a survey about demographics, exercise behaviors, eating behaviors, and common mental disorders.ResultsA total of 3022 women participated; 13% of participants were at high risk of an eating disorder based on Brief Eating Disorder in Athletes Questionnaire and Female Athlete Screening Tool scores. Twenty-five percent of participants had symptoms of anxiety (seven-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Assessment score >= 10), and 26% had symptoms of depression (nine-item Patient Health Questionnaire score >= 10). Older age was associated with a lower risk, and heavier body mass was associated with a higher risk, of eating disorders (P <= 0.043). Older age and higher rank were associated with a lower risk of symptoms of anxiety and depression (P <= 0.031), and a heavier body mass was associated with a higher risk of symptoms of depression (P <= 0.012). Longer habitual sleep duration was associated with a lower risk of eating disorders and symptoms of anxiety and depression (P <= 0.028). A higher volume of field exercise was associated with a lower risk, and a higher volume of military physical training and personal physical training was associated with a higher risk, of eating disorders (P <= 0.024). Job role and deployment history were not associated with any outcome.ConclusionsSleeping and training habits provide potential novel targets for exploring how common mental disorders can be managed in British servicewomen.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Examining the factor structure of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen in a national US military Veteran sample

    Abstract: Disordered eating is a prevalent and relevant health concern that remains understudied among U.S. military veterans. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a newly recognized feeding and eating disorder characterized by overly restrictive eating due to (a) picky eating, (b) lack of appetite, and (c) fear of aversive consequences related to eating. The Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) is a recently developed ARFID screening tool with initial validation studies demonstrating psychometric support. However, the psychometric properties of the NIAS have not been investigated in a veteran sample. To advance our understanding of ARFID screening tools that may be appropriate for use in veterans, the present study examined the factor structure of the NIAS using survey data from a large national sample of recently separated veterans (N = 1,486). Measurement invariance across key subgroups was tested in addition to exploring differential associations between the NIAS and related constructs. Results suggested that a three-factor model provided an excellent fit of the data and demonstrated scalar invariance across self-identified men and women, race and ethnicity, and sexual and gender minority (SGM) identity. Some subgroups had higher latent means on the picky eating (women, SGM, non-Hispanic Black), appetite (women, SGM), and fear (women) factors. The NIAS had some overlap with another measure of disordered eating and was moderately correlated with psychosocial impairment and mental health. Overall, the NIAS may be a useful screening tool for ARFID in veterans, given support for the three proposed subscales and equivalence across diverse identities.