Beyond the finish line

Abstract: Forces in Mind Trust’s mission is that all ex-Service persons and their families make a successful and sustainable transition to civilian life, a principle closely aligned to Invictus objectives. The publication of this report also marks the Trust’s enduring support for the Invictus vison. Through several iterations of the Invictus Games, interviews with a multitude of participants and families and addressing the unforeseen consequences and impact of the COVID pandemic, this report is significant as the first longitudinal investigation of the benefits of international adapted sport competition for Service Members and Veterans experiencing physical and/or psychological illnesses and injuries. As such, our hope is that it can be of use to Invictus Games and groups such as Help 4 Heroes, Walking With The Wounded and others offering any sort of sports or activities-based rehabilitation and recreation for wounded, injured and sick veterans, and, perhaps as well, those paralympic organisations where the ultimate competitive challenge might be found. The study’s general findings might seem self-evident: long-term competitive adaptive sports are valuable; sports are a good platform for personal growth; strengthening of the entire community of competitors, non-competitors and entourage in both physical and mental health is important. But the findings go further than this. The default view that ‘para-sports’ or adaptive games are only for the physically injured is comprehensively re-addressed and importantly recognises the complexity of participants conditions including their psychological impact. The short and longerterm dividends for improved personal resilience in all its dimensions are also empirically recorded with useful findings of where best practice can be found. The recognition of families and of those who might not compete is also important and recognising the importance of their resilience in the long road toward rehabilitation is a welcome aspect. The positivity of preparing for competition and competing itself is a genuine ‘team effort’ however broadly one defines that ‘team’. As the Invictus Games Foundation looks forward, reflecting upon the experience of Dusseldorf and looking ahead to Vancouver, this independent report can hopefully be seen as a validation of the founding aim of Invictus, to inspire through the power of the unconquered human spirit. But it also should be seen as a comprehensive and objective evaluation of the benefit of sport, with findings upon which to evolve and continually improve the experience for all concerned.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Examining the factor structure of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen in a national US military Veteran sample

    Abstract: Disordered eating is a prevalent and relevant health concern that remains understudied among U.S. military veterans. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a newly recognized feeding and eating disorder characterized by overly restrictive eating due to (a) picky eating, (b) lack of appetite, and (c) fear of aversive consequences related to eating. The Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) is a recently developed ARFID screening tool with initial validation studies demonstrating psychometric support. However, the psychometric properties of the NIAS have not been investigated in a veteran sample. To advance our understanding of ARFID screening tools that may be appropriate for use in veterans, the present study examined the factor structure of the NIAS using survey data from a large national sample of recently separated veterans (N = 1,486). Measurement invariance across key subgroups was tested in addition to exploring differential associations between the NIAS and related constructs. Results suggested that a three-factor model provided an excellent fit of the data and demonstrated scalar invariance across self-identified men and women, race and ethnicity, and sexual and gender minority (SGM) identity. Some subgroups had higher latent means on the picky eating (women, SGM, non-Hispanic Black), appetite (women, SGM), and fear (women) factors. The NIAS had some overlap with another measure of disordered eating and was moderately correlated with psychosocial impairment and mental health. Overall, the NIAS may be a useful screening tool for ARFID in veterans, given support for the three proposed subscales and equivalence across diverse identities.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed