Trauma exposure, mental health, and mental health treatment among LGBTQ+ Veterans and nonveterans

Abstract: Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer+ (LGBTQ+) veterans' and nonveterans' prevalence of potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and other stressor exposures, mental health concerns, and mental health treatment. METHOD: A subsample of veterans and nonveterans who identified as LGBTQ+ (N = 1,291; 851 veterans; 440 nonveterans) were identified from a national cohort of post-9/11 veterans and matched nonveterans. Majority of the sample identified as White (59.7%), men (40.4%), and gay or lesbian (48.6%). Measures included PTEs and other stressors, depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and receipt of mental health treatment. Logistic regressions compared the likelihood of experiencing PTEs and other stressors, self-reported mental health diagnoses, and mental health treatment between LGBTQ+ veterans and nonveterans. Results: Compared with LGBTQ+ nonveterans, LGBTQ+ veterans were more likely to report financial strain, divorce, discrimination, witnessing the sudden death of a friend or family member, and experiencing a serious accident or disaster. LGBTQ+ veterans reported greater depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptom severity than LGBTQ+ nonveterans. However, LGBTQ+ veterans were only more likely to receive psychotherapy for PTSD and did not differ from nonveterans in the likelihood of receiving any other types of mental health treatment. Conclusions: The study was the first to demonstrate that LGBTQ+ veterans have a greater prevalence of PTEs and other stressors and report worse mental health symptoms. These findings suggest that LGBTQ+ veterans may have unmet mental health treatment needs and need interventions to increase engagement in needed mental health services, especially for depression and anxiety.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Risk of incident mild cognitive impairment and dementia soon after leaving incarceration among a US Veteran population

    Abstract: Objectives: Increasing numbers of older adults are reentering community following incarceration (i.e., reentry), yet risk of incident neurodegenerative disorders associated with reentry is unknown. Our objective was to determine association between reentry status (reentry vs never-incarcerated) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or dementia. Methods: This nationwide, longitudinal cohort study used linked Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Veterans Health Administration data. Participants were aged 65 years or older who experienced reentry between October 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, with no preincarceration MCI/dementia, compared with age-matched/sex-matched never-incarcerated veterans. MCI/dementia was defined by diagnostic codes. Fine-Gray proportional hazards models were used to examine association. Results: This study included 35,520 veterans, mean age of 70 years, and approximately 1% women. The reentry group (N = 5,920) had higher incidence of MCI/dementia compared with the never-incarcerated group (N = 29,600; 10.2% vs 7.2%; fully adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.25). On further investigation, reentry was associated with increased risk of dementia with or without prior MCI diagnosis (aHR 1.21; 95% CI 1.06-1.39) but not MCI only. Discussion: Transition from incarceration to community increased risk of neurocognitive diagnosis. Findings indicate health/social services to identify and address significant cognitive deficits on late-life reentry. Limitations include generalizability to nonveterans.