Trauma exposure, mental health, and mental health treatment among LGBTQ+ Veterans and nonveterans

Abstract: Objective: The purpose of the study was to compare lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer+ (LGBTQ+) veterans' and nonveterans' prevalence of potentially traumatic events (PTEs) and other stressor exposures, mental health concerns, and mental health treatment. METHOD: A subsample of veterans and nonveterans who identified as LGBTQ+ (N = 1,291; 851 veterans; 440 nonveterans) were identified from a national cohort of post-9/11 veterans and matched nonveterans. Majority of the sample identified as White (59.7%), men (40.4%), and gay or lesbian (48.6%). Measures included PTEs and other stressors, depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), and receipt of mental health treatment. Logistic regressions compared the likelihood of experiencing PTEs and other stressors, self-reported mental health diagnoses, and mental health treatment between LGBTQ+ veterans and nonveterans. Results: Compared with LGBTQ+ nonveterans, LGBTQ+ veterans were more likely to report financial strain, divorce, discrimination, witnessing the sudden death of a friend or family member, and experiencing a serious accident or disaster. LGBTQ+ veterans reported greater depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptom severity than LGBTQ+ nonveterans. However, LGBTQ+ veterans were only more likely to receive psychotherapy for PTSD and did not differ from nonveterans in the likelihood of receiving any other types of mental health treatment. Conclusions: The study was the first to demonstrate that LGBTQ+ veterans have a greater prevalence of PTEs and other stressors and report worse mental health symptoms. These findings suggest that LGBTQ+ veterans may have unmet mental health treatment needs and need interventions to increase engagement in needed mental health services, especially for depression and anxiety.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, burnout, and psychological distress among U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft personnel: A multidimensional mediation model

    Abstract: U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft (USAF RPA) personnel face diverse stressors negatively affecting psychological health and military readiness. Prior research in diverse populations supports predictable impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational stressors, burnout, and more distal outcomes. Extending earlier studies linking broad variables (e.g., COVID-19 threat → work stress → burnout), the current study tests and refines an expanded mediation model based on multiple distinct pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, and burnout facets as antecedents of psychological distress mid-pandemic in RPA personnel (N = 496). Differential representation of demands, resources, and rewards evident across distinct occupational stressors in light of job demands/resources theory guided specification of mediated pathways. SEM analysis yielded moderate fit. Following removal of non-significant paths and addition of two interpretable direct paths, fit was improved, yielding seven dominant pandemic concern → occupational stressor → burnout → psychological distress pathways. In support of domain specification, five 'hub' variables (pandemic-driven change, personal stressors, workload, leader communication, and exhaustion) emerged as key intervention targets in mitigating distress in the USAF RPA community and similar populations during future pandemic-related crises.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed