A thematic analysis of perceptions of VHA emergency care and suicide risk assessment among Veterans experiencing homelessness

Abstract: Introduction: Veterans who are homeless are at elevated risk for suicide, and often access Veterans Health Administration (VHA) emergency services to address their health needs. We sought to explore experiences of homeless Veterans utilizing these services, and barriers and facilitators to suicide prevention engagement. Methods: Semi-structured interviews with 25 Veterans who self-reported past 12-month history of homelessness and accessed VHA emergency services. Interviews explored perceptions of VHA emergency care and suicide risk assessment. Results: Interviewees described a complex array of factors contributing to housing instability. Participants detailed challenges navigating interrelated, yet at times disconnected, systems of healthcare and homeless services. Veterans' experiences receiving care and suicide risk screening in VHA emergency services were generally positive. However, some described rare, striking experiences, feeling stigmatized for "being homeless". Services following discharge tended to be fragmented. Given numerous contextual factors (e.g. transportation difficulties, timeliness of referrals) complicated by homelessness, individuals tended to routinely rely upon VHA emergency service for future acute care needs. Conclusions: Overall, perceptions of emergency services, including suicide risk screening in this setting, were largely positive and deemed acceptable. However, findings illustrate multiple avenues for optimizing service delivery, including post-discharge services, among homeless Veterans accessing VHA emergency services.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Risk of incident mild cognitive impairment and dementia soon after leaving incarceration among a US Veteran population

    Abstract: Objectives: Increasing numbers of older adults are reentering community following incarceration (i.e., reentry), yet risk of incident neurodegenerative disorders associated with reentry is unknown. Our objective was to determine association between reentry status (reentry vs never-incarcerated) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or dementia. Methods: This nationwide, longitudinal cohort study used linked Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Veterans Health Administration data. Participants were aged 65 years or older who experienced reentry between October 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, with no preincarceration MCI/dementia, compared with age-matched/sex-matched never-incarcerated veterans. MCI/dementia was defined by diagnostic codes. Fine-Gray proportional hazards models were used to examine association. Results: This study included 35,520 veterans, mean age of 70 years, and approximately 1% women. The reentry group (N = 5,920) had higher incidence of MCI/dementia compared with the never-incarcerated group (N = 29,600; 10.2% vs 7.2%; fully adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.25). On further investigation, reentry was associated with increased risk of dementia with or without prior MCI diagnosis (aHR 1.21; 95% CI 1.06-1.39) but not MCI only. Discussion: Transition from incarceration to community increased risk of neurocognitive diagnosis. Findings indicate health/social services to identify and address significant cognitive deficits on late-life reentry. Limitations include generalizability to nonveterans.