Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea among Veterans and nonveterans

Abstract: Purpose: Understanding disease prevalence can inform treatment and resource needs across populations. This study aimed to identify the prevalence of sleep apnea (OSA) among veterans and nonveterans. Design: The national Comparative Health Assessment Interview Study, cross-sectional survey using probability-based sampling frames. Setting: Surveys completed by Internet or phone. Subjects: 15,166 veterans (40% response rate) and 4,654 nonveterans (57% response rate). Measures: Self-report of healthcare provider-based diagnosis of OSA. Analysis: Calculation of prevalence of OSA using statistical weighting to allow for direct comparison between veterans and nonveterans. Secondary analyses evaluated OSA by deployment status among veterans and compared average age of OSA diagnosis and differences in OSA prevalence among veterans and nonveterans stratified by gender, marital status, race/ethnicity, and posttraumatic stress disorder diagnosis. Results: OSA diagnosis was more than twice as prevalent among veterans (21%, 95% CI 20%-22%) than nonveterans (9%, 95% CI 8%-10%; aOR: 2.56, 95% CI 2.22-2.95, P < .001). Deployment was associated with higher odds of OSA among veterans (aOR: 1.64, 95% CI 1.43-18.7, P < 001.) Veterans were diagnosed with OSA on average 5 years earlier than nonveterans. Conclusion: Veterans have a high prevalence rate of OSA, highlighting the importance of veterans' access to treatment. OSA is likely underdiagnosed in nonveterans, particularly among racial/ethnic minoritized groups. Future research should investigate disparities in access to diagnostic testing for racial/ethnic minority nonveterans and/or risk factors for OSA among racial/ethnic minority veterans. The increased odds of OSA among those with PTSD highlights in the importance of early referral for OSA testing by providers as well as development of trauma-informed strategies to promote OSA treatment adherence. Limitations include a bias toward underestimation of true disease prevalence due to self-report of diagnosis.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, burnout, and psychological distress among U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft personnel: A multidimensional mediation model

    Abstract: U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft (USAF RPA) personnel face diverse stressors negatively affecting psychological health and military readiness. Prior research in diverse populations supports predictable impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational stressors, burnout, and more distal outcomes. Extending earlier studies linking broad variables (e.g., COVID-19 threat → work stress → burnout), the current study tests and refines an expanded mediation model based on multiple distinct pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, and burnout facets as antecedents of psychological distress mid-pandemic in RPA personnel (N = 496). Differential representation of demands, resources, and rewards evident across distinct occupational stressors in light of job demands/resources theory guided specification of mediated pathways. SEM analysis yielded moderate fit. Following removal of non-significant paths and addition of two interpretable direct paths, fit was improved, yielding seven dominant pandemic concern → occupational stressor → burnout → psychological distress pathways. In support of domain specification, five 'hub' variables (pandemic-driven change, personal stressors, workload, leader communication, and exhaustion) emerged as key intervention targets in mitigating distress in the USAF RPA community and similar populations during future pandemic-related crises.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed