Meaning in life (but not life satisfaction) moderates the effects of battlefield experiences on suicidal ideation and anxiety

Abstract: Objective: Although research has been conducted in the last decade distinguishing between meaning in life and life satisfaction, no research has examined whether their potential moderating role in mental health problems is distinct. Among military personnel, mental health is paramount, and suicide is one of the leading causes of death. Method: Data were collected to determine the potential moderating effects of meaning in life and/or life satisfaction of battlefield experiences on depression, anxiety, and thoughts about death (including suicidal ideation). Data were collected on 851 total military personnel, spanning two distinct survey administrations, who reported at least one combat deployment. Results: Findings suggest that meaning in life has a significant moderating effect on the impact of life-threatening experiences on anxiety and thoughts about death (including suicidal ideation), but no moderating effect on depression. Life satisfaction had no significant moderating role for any mental health outcome. Conclusions: This research suggests that meaning in life is a significant buffer against certain negative mental health outcomes stemming from life-threatening experiences. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved) — This research suggests that the relationship between life-threatening experiences in military service and anxiety and suicidal ideation is moderated by meaning in life. The results provide guidance concerning whether these kinds of events are relevant to these mental health symptoms presented by military veterans and personnel, suggesting a particularly strong impact among those who lack meaning in life specifically, rather than those lacking satisfaction with life generally.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Risk of incident mild cognitive impairment and dementia soon after leaving incarceration among a US Veteran population

    Abstract: Objectives: Increasing numbers of older adults are reentering community following incarceration (i.e., reentry), yet risk of incident neurodegenerative disorders associated with reentry is unknown. Our objective was to determine association between reentry status (reentry vs never-incarcerated) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and/or dementia. Methods: This nationwide, longitudinal cohort study used linked Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services and Veterans Health Administration data. Participants were aged 65 years or older who experienced reentry between October 1, 2012, and December 31, 2018, with no preincarceration MCI/dementia, compared with age-matched/sex-matched never-incarcerated veterans. MCI/dementia was defined by diagnostic codes. Fine-Gray proportional hazards models were used to examine association. Results: This study included 35,520 veterans, mean age of 70 years, and approximately 1% women. The reentry group (N = 5,920) had higher incidence of MCI/dementia compared with the never-incarcerated group (N = 29,600; 10.2% vs 7.2%; fully adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.12; 95% CI 1.00-1.25). On further investigation, reentry was associated with increased risk of dementia with or without prior MCI diagnosis (aHR 1.21; 95% CI 1.06-1.39) but not MCI only. Discussion: Transition from incarceration to community increased risk of neurocognitive diagnosis. Findings indicate health/social services to identify and address significant cognitive deficits on late-life reentry. Limitations include generalizability to nonveterans.