Gatekeepers of justice: Law enforcement attitudes about and decisions with Veterans

Abstract: The occurrence of mental health problems among military veterans is high (Kulka et al., 1988; Milliken et al., 2007) and has been linked to criminal justice involvement of veterans (Greenberg & Rosenheck, 2009; Institute of Medicine, 2010). The Sequential Intercept Model (SIM; Griffin et al., 2015) was created and adapted to address the needs of justice-involved veterans (JIVs). The SIM consists of six points that serve as digression points diverting veterans away from the criminal justice system (Blue-Howells et al., 2013). Prior decision-making research related to JIVs in the SIM focused on intercept three (court system). Given that Law Enforcement Officers (LEOs) are the gatekeepers of the criminal justice process, research examining the unique interactions between LEOs, and veterans is essential. Police decision making research has examined mental illness stigma (Soomro & Yanos, 2019), perceived dangerousness (Watson et al., 2004a), blameworthiness (Jones et al., 2021), and punitiveness (Mendias & Kehoe, 2006) as factors that influence LEOs decisions. A specific gap in the literature is identifying the beliefs LEOs hold towards veterans. The first aim of this study was the development of a measure which assessed LEOs beliefs about military veterans. Secondly, this study extends the current literature through examining the effects of mental illness stigma, blameworthiness, perceived dangerousness, punitiveness on LEOs response (i.e., arrest, warning/informal sanction, transport to psychiatric facility, or no action) to case scenario depicting a military veteran exhibiting symptoms of PTSD and law-breaking behavior. Results indicate LEOs view veterans as exceptional people and as burdensome to their communities. Further, subtle mental illness stigma and veterans as a burden were associated with endorsement of a criminal justice response. However, when the LEOs ultimate response was evaluated, none of the variables were predictive of the decision. Implications regarding LEO trainings regarding veteran-LEO interactions and the contribution of these results to the SIM is also discussed.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Examining the factor structure of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen in a national US military Veteran sample

    Abstract: Disordered eating is a prevalent and relevant health concern that remains understudied among U.S. military veterans. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a newly recognized feeding and eating disorder characterized by overly restrictive eating due to (a) picky eating, (b) lack of appetite, and (c) fear of aversive consequences related to eating. The Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) is a recently developed ARFID screening tool with initial validation studies demonstrating psychometric support. However, the psychometric properties of the NIAS have not been investigated in a veteran sample. To advance our understanding of ARFID screening tools that may be appropriate for use in veterans, the present study examined the factor structure of the NIAS using survey data from a large national sample of recently separated veterans (N = 1,486). Measurement invariance across key subgroups was tested in addition to exploring differential associations between the NIAS and related constructs. Results suggested that a three-factor model provided an excellent fit of the data and demonstrated scalar invariance across self-identified men and women, race and ethnicity, and sexual and gender minority (SGM) identity. Some subgroups had higher latent means on the picky eating (women, SGM, non-Hispanic Black), appetite (women, SGM), and fear (women) factors. The NIAS had some overlap with another measure of disordered eating and was moderately correlated with psychosocial impairment and mental health. Overall, the NIAS may be a useful screening tool for ARFID in veterans, given support for the three proposed subscales and equivalence across diverse identities.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed