The application of trauma-informed care to health care for military-connected individuals

Abstract: Introduction: Military families face unique stressors beyond civilian life, such as deployments, frequent relocations, and the potential for combat, all of which can significantly impact well-being. A trauma-informed care (TIC) approach to military medicine is paramount; however, a critical gap exists, with no published curricula to guide practitioners in employing TIC in the care of military-connected individuals. Methods: We delivered a 50-minute interactive and virtual session to second-year medical students at the Uniformed Services University (USU) that reviewed the neurobiology of adversity and the relevance of TIC in caring for military-connected populations. Participants completed a 14-question pre- and posttest on perceived knowledge, attitudes, practice, and confidence, as well as posttest questions evaluating session quality. The USU Institutional Review Board approved this evaluation. Results: One hundred sixty medical students participated in the session, with 78 matched pre- and posttest responses. We observed a statistically significant pre-post improvement (p ≤ .05) in all category scores, with the largest changes in knowledge (1.33) and confidence (1.33). On a 5-point Likert scale, with 5 being best, mean scores for overall quality of the session and relevance of the material to participants' learning and future practice were 3.95 and 4.20, respectively. Discussion: By equipping health care providers with knowledge and confidence to apply TIC in military medicine, we can improve the well-being of service members and their families across both military and civilian health care settings. Broader implementation of this program has potential to improve patient outcomes and overall health care delivery for this population.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, burnout, and psychological distress among U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft personnel: A multidimensional mediation model

    Abstract: U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft (USAF RPA) personnel face diverse stressors negatively affecting psychological health and military readiness. Prior research in diverse populations supports predictable impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational stressors, burnout, and more distal outcomes. Extending earlier studies linking broad variables (e.g., COVID-19 threat → work stress → burnout), the current study tests and refines an expanded mediation model based on multiple distinct pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, and burnout facets as antecedents of psychological distress mid-pandemic in RPA personnel (N = 496). Differential representation of demands, resources, and rewards evident across distinct occupational stressors in light of job demands/resources theory guided specification of mediated pathways. SEM analysis yielded moderate fit. Following removal of non-significant paths and addition of two interpretable direct paths, fit was improved, yielding seven dominant pandemic concern → occupational stressor → burnout → psychological distress pathways. In support of domain specification, five 'hub' variables (pandemic-driven change, personal stressors, workload, leader communication, and exhaustion) emerged as key intervention targets in mitigating distress in the USAF RPA community and similar populations during future pandemic-related crises.

    Mental Health Peer reviewed