Important considerations for research on intimate partner violence-related brain injury from the Enhancing Neuroimaging and Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) consortium intimate partner violence working group

Abstract: Purpose: Women exposed to intimate partner violence (IPV) may experience head, neck, and facial trauma, increasing their risk for concomitant brain injury (BI). The study of IPV-BI poses unique challenges due to safety, demographic, biological, and social factors, requiring considerations beyond the commonly used methods employed in BI research. Thus, this special article examines research considerations unique to IPV-BI research to enable future robust investigation. Method: Members of the ENIGMA IPV Working Group (WG), encompassing a multidisciplinary team of researchers, clinicians, community partners, and advocates, described methodological considerations and challenges they encounter in IPV-BI research studies and clinical practice. Results: Key points identified as important research challenges/considerations include: 1) lifetime exposure to single versus repetitive head trauma; 2) biological and social determinants of health; 3) premorbid/comorbid physical and psychological health conditions; and 4) consideration of specific comparison groups. Conclusions: As studies are urgently needed to examine many aspects of IPV-BI, addressing the research challenges in a rigorous way will enable robust examination of the cognitive, psychological, and neurological correlates of IPV-BI, which can in turn, better inform prevention and treatment strategies.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Examining the factor structure of the nine-item avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder screen in a national US military Veteran sample

    Abstract: Disordered eating is a prevalent and relevant health concern that remains understudied among U.S. military veterans. Avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a newly recognized feeding and eating disorder characterized by overly restrictive eating due to (a) picky eating, (b) lack of appetite, and (c) fear of aversive consequences related to eating. The Nine-Item ARFID Screen (NIAS) is a recently developed ARFID screening tool with initial validation studies demonstrating psychometric support. However, the psychometric properties of the NIAS have not been investigated in a veteran sample. To advance our understanding of ARFID screening tools that may be appropriate for use in veterans, the present study examined the factor structure of the NIAS using survey data from a large national sample of recently separated veterans (N = 1,486). Measurement invariance across key subgroups was tested in addition to exploring differential associations between the NIAS and related constructs. Results suggested that a three-factor model provided an excellent fit of the data and demonstrated scalar invariance across self-identified men and women, race and ethnicity, and sexual and gender minority (SGM) identity. Some subgroups had higher latent means on the picky eating (women, SGM, non-Hispanic Black), appetite (women, SGM), and fear (women) factors. The NIAS had some overlap with another measure of disordered eating and was moderately correlated with psychosocial impairment and mental health. Overall, the NIAS may be a useful screening tool for ARFID in veterans, given support for the three proposed subscales and equivalence across diverse identities.