Black Veterans’ insight on racial disparities in military administrative separations

Abstract: Military service provides a path toward the middle class by granting veterans benefits, including healthcare and compensation for disabilities acquired during service. Military characterization of service, assigned by the Department of Defense at separation, can qualify or disqualify veterans from benefits access. Black service members are 50% more likely than White service members to receive an Other Than Honorable rather than an Honorable discharge, resulting in disproportionate impediments to the benefits designed to facilitate re-entry into civilian life and prevent poverty. Yet, the Department of Defense provides little meaningful remedy for Black veterans to correct less than Honorable discharges, instead operating under a presumption that the service member’s own misconduct warranted these discharges. The present study analyzed 26 semi-structured interviews with Black military veterans to gain insight into their experiences in service and how they conceptualize the causes of racial disparities in military separations. The study revealed persistent mechanisms of structural racism in the armed services. The participants (1) described the military as reflective of racialized civilian society rather than a race-neutral meritocracy, (2) emphasized the ability to adapt and conform to white cultural norms as key to success, (3) recounted overt instances of racial harassment, and (4) described a lack of access to accurate information about the administrative separation process. The participants’ experiences of racism in the military suggest that service members’ conduct alone does not explain the statistical racial disparity in ‘bad paper’ discharges and indicate a need for better pathways for Black veterans to correct their discharge status.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Effects of Veterans Affairs access expansions on inpatient care for women Veterans

    Abstract: Background: Enactment of the Veterans Choice Act (VCA) in 2014 and expansion of Medicaid programs led to greater options for Veterans to receive health care outside of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). However, little is known about how much care women Veterans receive in VA or non-VA settings paid by VA or other insurance types. We explore trends in inpatient care received by women Veterans before and after implementation of the VCA, focusing on hospitalizations, as these patients are often higher risk. Methods: Data for women Veterans were linked to hospital discharge data for 2013-2017 from 11 diverse states. Patient and hospital characteristics by VA and non-VA payer and age group (less than 65 years and 65 years and older) were compared for acute hospitalizations in Pearson's chi-square and analysis of variance tests. We compared the odds of a hospitalization occurring before and after VCA implementation for each specific setting/payer using separate logistic regressions. Results: Our sample included 117,177 acute medical/surgical hospitalizations. For younger women, the most common hospital setting/payer was VA hospitals (36%); older women most frequently received hospital care in non-VA hospitals covered by Medicare (61%). After the VCA, the probability of receiving VA-purchased care increased significantly for older women only. Younger women saw a significant decrease in VA hospitalizations post-VCA. Conclusions: We found that after multiple expansions in non-VA health care options, women Veterans sought more VA-purchased community hospital care.