Recognition of LGBT+ Veterans: FAQs

Abstract: Summary: Prior to 2000, being LGBT+ was considered to be incompatible with service in the armed forces. The government has explained this meant that those serving who were or were perceived to be gay, lesbian or trans could be dismissed or otherwise forced to leave the armed forces. LGBT Veterans Independent Review: In 2022 the government commissioned an independent review of the impact that the pre-2000 ban on homosexuality in the armed forces has had on LGBT veterans. Lord Etherton, who led the review, made 49 recommendations in his report covering the areas of “restitution, recognition and just satisfaction”. On publication of the review in July 2023, then Prime Minister Rishi Sunak apologised on behalf of the country to LGBT veterans who were affected by the policy. His government began implementing the recommendations made by Lord Etherton. Implementing the review: Implementation has continued under the current Labour government. On 12 December 2024, the Defence Secretary, John Healey, announced the implementation of many of the remaining recommendations, including the establishment of a financial recognition scheme. John Healey said the scheme is not a compensation scheme, but is intended to “recognise the discrimination and detriment suffered by LGBT personnel under the ban”. Restoration of rank: The Defence Secretary also announced measures to allow LGBT personnel who served before the ban was lifted in 2000 to apply for the restoration of rank and the qualification of administrative discharge, if applicable. Financial recognition: The Ministry of Defence (MOD) has allocated £75 million for the financial recognition scheme, with a flat payment of £50,000 for “veterans who were dismissed or administratively discharged, including officers instructed to resign because of their actual or perceived sexual orientation or their gender identity under the ban”. A further “impact payment”, up to £20,000 per individual, will be also be available to eligible personnel. The financial restorative measures only apply to personnel who served between 1967 and 2000. The government has extended some of the non- financial restorative measures to those serving prior to 1967. Recommendations yet to be implemented: Of the 49 recommendations made by Lord Etherton, seven are yet to be fully implemented. This includes a memorial, planning for which is underway. Most are for the NHS to fulfil. The Minister for Veterans and People, Al Carns, has said he expects to complete the remaining recommendations "by 2027”. This briefing answers some frequently asked questions about the review and points to further resources provided by the government on eligibility and how to apply for restorative measures.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Effects of Veterans Affairs access expansions on inpatient care for women Veterans

    Abstract: Background: Enactment of the Veterans Choice Act (VCA) in 2014 and expansion of Medicaid programs led to greater options for Veterans to receive health care outside of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). However, little is known about how much care women Veterans receive in VA or non-VA settings paid by VA or other insurance types. We explore trends in inpatient care received by women Veterans before and after implementation of the VCA, focusing on hospitalizations, as these patients are often higher risk. Methods: Data for women Veterans were linked to hospital discharge data for 2013-2017 from 11 diverse states. Patient and hospital characteristics by VA and non-VA payer and age group (less than 65 years and 65 years and older) were compared for acute hospitalizations in Pearson's chi-square and analysis of variance tests. We compared the odds of a hospitalization occurring before and after VCA implementation for each specific setting/payer using separate logistic regressions. Results: Our sample included 117,177 acute medical/surgical hospitalizations. For younger women, the most common hospital setting/payer was VA hospitals (36%); older women most frequently received hospital care in non-VA hospitals covered by Medicare (61%). After the VCA, the probability of receiving VA-purchased care increased significantly for older women only. Younger women saw a significant decrease in VA hospitalizations post-VCA. Conclusions: We found that after multiple expansions in non-VA health care options, women Veterans sought more VA-purchased community hospital care.

    Physical Health Peer reviewed