Development of the protective factors survey, military families (PFS-MF)

Abstract: Many family service organizations offer services targeted to the needs of families with one or both parents serving in a branch of the armed forces. To support these organizations, we adapted the Protective Factors Survey, 2nd Edition (PFS-2) to capture experiences of military family life and establish the new survey's reliability and validity. We conducted focus groups with military family members, consulted with experts in field, and reviewed existing research to develop new items. We fielded an online survey with a convenience sample of military family members and civilian caregivers to collect data on new and existing PFS-2 items, which we analyzed for performance with military families compared to civilians, and psychometric characteristics. Our analysis confirmed that original PFS-2 items worked well for military families, and there was not a significant difference between how military and non-military respondents responded to these items. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed a 5-factor structure, representing protective factor constructs of nurturing and attachment, social support, concrete support, military family life and resilience, and a fifth construct related to program evaluation. The Protective Factors Survey, Military Families (PFS-MF) possesses sound psychometric properties measuring protective factors which support family resilience and reduce the probability of child maltreatment. The PFS-MF fills a gap as a short, free, flexible survey that measures multiple protective factors as they relate to the military experience. It can be used as an evaluation tool to measure program effectiveness, inform needs assessments, make programmatic decisions, and tailor individual services.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    Temporal trends in opioid-related care and pain among Veterans at the end of life

    Abstract: Context: In response to the opioid crisis, federal guidelines were implemented, including the Veterans Health Administration's (VA) Opioid Safety Initiative in 2013. The impact of policies on patients near the end of life is unknown. Objective: Examine temporal trends in opioid prescribing, pain, and opioid overdoses among Veterans near the end of life. Methods: Retrospective, time series analysis of VA decedents between October 2009 and September 2018 whose next-of-kin participated in VA's Bereaved Family Survey (BFS). Using multivariate regression to adjust for sociodemographic and clinical covariates, we examined temporal trends in outpatient opioid prescribing, uncontrolled pain based on BFS report, and opioid overdose-related hospitalizations, in the last month of life, overall and by clinical diagnosis (cancer versus non-cancer). Results: Among 79,409 decedents, mean daily outpatient opioid dose in morphine milligram equivalents in the last month of life decreased from 4.6 mg in 2010 to 2.1 mg in 2018 (adjusted change -0.20 mg/year; P