Shifting paradigms: Retired military leaders and the redefinition of masculinity in the armed forces

Abstract: This study examined retired military leaders’ subjective perspectives, attitudes, beliefs, and reflections regarding their experiences with hegemonic masculinity among their soldiers. The central focus was to understand how these retired leaders perceive and propose strategies to address hegemonic masculinity within the military ranks. The research explored the approaches and insights of retired veterans in navigating the complex interplay between hegemonic masculinity and emotional intelligence, aiming to uncover practical strategies for addressing this challenge. Since the study involved gathering data from the experiences of retired military leaders, the methodology of generic qualitative inquiry was used. Nine semi structured questions helped gather the necessary data to answer the research question, "How does emotional intelligence aid retired military leaders' subjective opinions, attitudes, beliefs, or reflections on their experiences with hegemonic masculinity among their soldiers?" The study's participants proved the need for leadership programs focused on emotional intelligence in military settings, programs to educate students about gender norms, better health programs overall, and support groups to help people feel less stigmatized and more accessible. The findings have implications for contemporary military leaders, active soldiers, prospective recruits, and organizations dedicated to mental health support. As a generic qualitative study grounded in general psychology, this research illuminated the experiences of retired military leaders and their soldiers, contributing to efforts to address and counteract hegemonic masculinity within the military.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Researchers

    Pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, burnout, and psychological distress among U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft personnel: A multidimensional mediation model

    Abstract: U.S. Air Force remotely piloted aircraft (USAF RPA) personnel face diverse stressors negatively affecting psychological health and military readiness. Prior research in diverse populations supports predictable impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on occupational stressors, burnout, and more distal outcomes. Extending earlier studies linking broad variables (e.g., COVID-19 threat → work stress → burnout), the current study tests and refines an expanded mediation model based on multiple distinct pandemic concerns, occupational stressors, and burnout facets as antecedents of psychological distress mid-pandemic in RPA personnel (N = 496). Differential representation of demands, resources, and rewards evident across distinct occupational stressors in light of job demands/resources theory guided specification of mediated pathways. SEM analysis yielded moderate fit. Following removal of non-significant paths and addition of two interpretable direct paths, fit was improved, yielding seven dominant pandemic concern → occupational stressor → burnout → psychological distress pathways. In support of domain specification, five 'hub' variables (pandemic-driven change, personal stressors, workload, leader communication, and exhaustion) emerged as key intervention targets in mitigating distress in the USAF RPA community and similar populations during future pandemic-related crises.