A review of the military basic pay table: Analysis in support of the fourteenth quadrennial review of military compensation

Abstract: Rapid increases in inflation since 2020, a strong labor market, together with military recruiting struggles and reported food insecurity among military members, have put a spotlight on military compensation and on the foundational element of the compensation system, military basic pay. The National Defense Authorization Act for 2023 mandated a study of military basic pay, as does the charter of the 14th Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation, the White House–directed commission that studies military compensation. The Fourteenth Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation requested the RAND National Defense Research Institute to conduct such a study. In this report, the authors assess the basic pay tables of junior, midcareer, and senior enlisted personnel and commissioned officers; evaluate the Employment Cost Index (ECI) as a guide to the annual pay raise, as well as alternatives; compare military pay, measured by regular military compensation, with civilian earnings and evaluate the 70th percentile benchmark developed by the Ninth Quadrennial Review of Military Compensation in 2002; and assess pay for service members in critical specialties and whether and how basic pay could be used to address personnel needs in these specialties. The authors also review recent trends in the civilian labor market that might affect recruiting and retention outcomes and the adequacy of military basic pay; develop proposals for change, drawing from past studies and commissions that have assessed military compensation; present findings from discussions with subject-matter experts and a review of relevant academic literature; and analyze pay, personnel, and civilian labor market data.

Read the full article
Report a problem with this article

Related articles

  • More for Policy & Practice

    ‘Grown up’ children from armed forces families: Reflections on experiences of childhood and education

    Abstract: This research set out to investigate the experiences of ‘grown up’ children from armed forces families, to gather their reflections on childhood and education, and to seek their advice to inform the current armed forces community, policy-makers and practitioners. The Service Children’s Progression Alliance (SCiP) defines a child from an armed forces family as “a person whose parent or carer serves in the Regular Armed Forces, or as a Reservist, or has done at any point during the first 25 years of that person’s life” (SCiP, 2017: para 2) and the Office for Students refers to this definition in their documentation relating to student characteristics (OfS n.d. para 8, see also OfS, 2020: para 11). In this research we use the term ‘grown up’ to indicate individuals over the age of 18 recognised to have reached the legal age of adulthood in the UK. This group of individuals are currently overlooked in research, policy and practice as the focus continues to be on serving members of the armed forces, veterans, and families, including school-aged children.